Jump to content

mstalder

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mstalder

Personal Information

  • First Name
    Michael
  • Last Name
    Stalder
  • Company/University Name
    Berner Fachhochschule

Converted

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

mstalder's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare
  • One Year In Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Hi! Yes that is how I experienced it. Entity ID can be used as creation sequence. Not 100% sure if there are exceptions.
  2. Hi Christine, The way I set it up for a standard server is as follows: 1. Use a Dynamic Selection Rule "Smallest Value First" based on Entity ID and set the filter expression to my match condition 2. Keep an Index FilteredQueue which I update with a SearchStep with same match condition everytime an entity leaves or enters the InputBuffer or if the condition changes (happens when property which candidate is compared to changes). 3. On every seize request FilteredQueue is checked, if 0 the request is denied. This does what I need. My only "problem" is that I need to enter the match condition twice, once for the Dynamic Selection Rule and once for the SearchStep. So, is there a way I can access the filter expression property of the dynamic selection rule for use in the SearchStep?
  3. Hi, Is it possible to access the filter expression of standard Dynamic Selection Rules for use in processes? Basically I want to filter queues based on some Entity properties, eg, being a specific material. However standard dispatching rules only apply the filter if multiple entities are in the queue. Eg, if a an entity of "wrong" type arrives to the InputBuffer of a Server and the input buffer is empty it will seize the queue anyway. In my case I want to keep the server starved until an entity of correct type arrives. I found a way to implement that by filtering the queue with the same expression as used in the dynamic selection rule, however I need to add another property for that expression, which is a bit confusing. Thanks for your help Michael
×
×
  • Create New...