by Adam Graunke, Gabriel Burnett & Charles Hu (Boeing Research and Technology)
As presented at the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference
With increasing demand for lightweight composite airplanes, advanced composite manufacturing techniques are being developed to deliver more airplanes quickly, with increased quality and decreased costs. These advanced techniques require production readiness evaluations as part of airplane development programs. Manufacturing techniques must be evaluated for cost, rate capability, and quality, among other considerations. This study considers a composite layup technique called AFP (Automated Fiber Placement) as applied to large airplane structures. The study’s goals were to determine critical performance variables for further technology development, to determine rate and quality capability, and to define baseline performance requirements. An agent-based approach was used to allow for parameter experimentation across a large number of variables and variable values. The result was a validated set of performance parameters with baseline values to meet program requirements.
Problem Statement
This study was requested by manufacturing technology groups within Boeing to evaluate the feasibility and capability of AFP for use on a specific part for an airplane program in development. The requestors were interested in estimating how the current state of the art would perform on a given part in a proposed production system. Furthermore, they were interested in developing a set of parameters and minimum allowable values for use in a Request for Proposal (RFP) document. The customer provided a set of decision variables, KPIs, and system properties as detailed in Table 1. They also provided high-level part geometry and production rate requirements.
Table 1. Problem characteristics
Decision variables: Number of robots, number of heads per robot |
KPIs: Layup speed (pounds per hour) for specified part, system non-recurring cost |
Downtime parameters: Head change time, Spool capacity, Percent failed courses, Downtime per failure, Quality check time |
Performance parameters: Acceleration/Deceleration, Max Linear speed, Max rotational speed, Cut time, Min distance between robots |