<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Success in Simulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simio.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simio.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Engineers are Happy by MUHAMMAD SAJID</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2009/01/18/industrial-engineers-are-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-66864</link>
		<dc:creator>MUHAMMAD SAJID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2009/01/18/industrial-engineers-are-happy/#comment-66864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes,Industrial Engineers are happy persons.....before starting undergraduate in industrial engineering i was worry about this field because i caught it by chance..but now i am in third year and i am very very happy because i will get the degree of industrial engineering.It is broad area of making things better and solving problems..i would like to say one sentence obout this field.   &quot;WHEN WE REST THE WORLD IS AT RISK&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes,Industrial Engineers are happy persons&#8230;..before starting undergraduate in industrial engineering i was worry about this field because i caught it by chance..but now i am in third year and i am very very happy because i will get the degree of industrial engineering.It is broad area of making things better and solving problems..i would like to say one sentence obout this field.   &#8220;WHEN WE REST THE WORLD IS AT RISK&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Predicting Process Variability by Combining Lean Six Sigma with Simulation Software &#124; Pyzdek Institute</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/11/03/predicting-process-variability/comment-page-1/#comment-65328</link>
		<dc:creator>Combining Lean Six Sigma with Simulation Software &#124; Pyzdek Institute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/11/03/predicting-process-variability/#comment-65328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is the opening line from a Predicting Process Variability blog. It is also, according to the blog, “the driving force behind most improvement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the opening line from a Predicting Process Variability blog. It is also, according to the blog, “the driving force behind most improvement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Project Objectives and Specifications &#8211; Driving your Customer to Success by Haoxian He</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/06/11/project-objectives-and-specifications-driving-your-customer-to-success/comment-page-1/#comment-64292</link>
		<dc:creator>Haoxian He</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/06/11/project-objectives-and-specifications-driving-your-customer-to-success/#comment-64292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My point is doing a good functional specification first. Then the problems mentioned in this article will be solved.
In this blog article, I found two main points.
1.	Set up project objective: recognize stakeholders.
2.	Start with a small prototype for each phase.
3.	Don&#039;t think it is wasting time to do a good functional specification. 
All I agree with is based on a good functional specification, if we doing a simulation project without a complete functional specification that might means I didn’t know my stakeholders well. On the other words, I don’t know what I’m doing for as the article says. 
If we didn’t have a good functional specification, we don’t even know what objectives of each phase’s. So we can start with a small prototype either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is doing a good functional specification first. Then the problems mentioned in this article will be solved.<br />
In this blog article, I found two main points.<br />
1.	Set up project objective: recognize stakeholders.<br />
2.	Start with a small prototype for each phase.<br />
3.	Don&#8217;t think it is wasting time to do a good functional specification.<br />
All I agree with is based on a good functional specification, if we doing a simulation project without a complete functional specification that might means I didn’t know my stakeholders well. On the other words, I don’t know what I’m doing for as the article says.<br />
If we didn’t have a good functional specification, we don’t even know what objectives of each phase’s. So we can start with a small prototype either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prove This by Haoxian He</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/23/prove-this/comment-page-1/#comment-63783</link>
		<dc:creator>Haoxian He</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/23/prove-this/#comment-63783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talking about integrity, people may give up their integrity to satisfy their customers at least what they expected. The meaning of evaluating a model is proving its feasibility not fixing the results to satisfy customers’ needs.
As a simulationist, if we just keep fixing the results but not telling the truth. What will happen? The model will lose its real function when taking into real world obviously. We should know our duty clearly and keep our integrity. Telling the truth at least let your customers know, even they insisting their thoughts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about integrity, people may give up their integrity to satisfy their customers at least what they expected. The meaning of evaluating a model is proving its feasibility not fixing the results to satisfy customers’ needs.<br />
As a simulationist, if we just keep fixing the results but not telling the truth. What will happen? The model will lose its real function when taking into real world obviously. We should know our duty clearly and keep our integrity. Telling the truth at least let your customers know, even they insisting their thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Model This by Haoxian He</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/19/model-this/comment-page-1/#comment-63782</link>
		<dc:creator>Haoxian He</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/19/model-this/#comment-63782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the points of this article to a certain degree that there are two points I totally agree with.
1.	Without close interaction with stakeholders, there are no clear objectives in the model.
2.	If we keep modelling without any clear objectives, we may become overconfident with our “brilliant” model skills. As we model more and more useless model, we could not do an actual model for customers but only able to make models for fun.
But there is on point that I keep reserved opinion. If my boss offers me a job to “model this”, I am still a new boy in simulation. I will take the job and define some objective myself in the model. Of course I am supposing that I am too new to accept a real job. I always believe practise makes perfect. So do not think modelling is wasting time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the points of this article to a certain degree that there are two points I totally agree with.<br />
1.	Without close interaction with stakeholders, there are no clear objectives in the model.<br />
2.	If we keep modelling without any clear objectives, we may become overconfident with our “brilliant” model skills. As we model more and more useless model, we could not do an actual model for customers but only able to make models for fun.<br />
But there is on point that I keep reserved opinion. If my boss offers me a job to “model this”, I am still a new boy in simulation. I will take the job and define some objective myself in the model. Of course I am supposing that I am too new to accept a real job. I always believe practise makes perfect. So do not think modelling is wasting time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Magic Formula For Success &#8211; Part 2 by Liangyi Hu</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/12/magic-formula-for-success-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-63322</link>
		<dc:creator>Liangyi Hu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/07/magic-formula-for-success-part-2/#comment-63322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solving problem is an important issue.

To jump out the thinking: I am just doing a work boss assigned, he told me what to do and how to do, I gonna do it.

This is what lots of we young man need to change: to get a panorama view of whole business. To explain your existence and reason you get the money paid.

This panorama view is a basic attitude for work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solving problem is an important issue.</p>
<p>To jump out the thinking: I am just doing a work boss assigned, he told me what to do and how to do, I gonna do it.</p>
<p>This is what lots of we young man need to change: to get a panorama view of whole business. To explain your existence and reason you get the money paid.</p>
<p>This panorama view is a basic attitude for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Magic Formula for Success by Liangyi Hu</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-magic-formula-for-success-2/comment-page-1/#comment-63321</link>
		<dc:creator>Liangyi Hu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/05/07/the-magic-formula-for-success/#comment-63321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first I was trying to pick some disagreements to prove that I have read this carefully as an assignments.

I had been worked for three years in a small radiator manufacturer.

And My experience there kept asking a question: the comparison between human intuition and computer simulation. Especially when I was having lectures.

We were not producing radiators for cars but radiators for diesel generators and some other customized machines. I was not doing IE job there but I kept thinking a lot since I am a IE undergraduate before.

As defined by the industrial, averagely, there is a new model added to the database per 3 or 4 days, each new model may have similar name of parts but the size and even shape may look different, which make the processing more complicate or impossible to make plan every time.

Because once you make a processing plan, one day or half a day passed, and workers won&#039;t even take a look at it, they just look at the assembly drawings and gather the parts together, assemble them.

Since lots of the products are customized, the producing time varies a lot, sometimes workers spend short time to assemble it because it was precisely machined, sometimes it cost a huge time for them to assemble together due to inaccurate tolerances.

What worse is, the painting job is outsourced, actually it is called &#039;Electrophoresis&#039; (probably!), which makes it harder to get a preciser processing time.

What even worse is, we cannot do processing plan, we just design them, and send drawings and CNC codes to the manufacturing Dept. to produce them directly, without instructions from technology Dept.

There is no time to do such job~ you will fall behind your competitors.

I kept thinking the poor quality generated by this way, accompanied with poor standard and processing plan.

Each product likes a building, it has common feature like foundations, structures, walls, floors, interiors and exteriors, but each feature won&#039;t be the same for two buildings, what problem is, we have hundreds of such types and still increasing with high speed.

That&#039;s what I kept thinking, when can we simulate such a small but messy plant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I was trying to pick some disagreements to prove that I have read this carefully as an assignments.</p>
<p>I had been worked for three years in a small radiator manufacturer.</p>
<p>And My experience there kept asking a question: the comparison between human intuition and computer simulation. Especially when I was having lectures.</p>
<p>We were not producing radiators for cars but radiators for diesel generators and some other customized machines. I was not doing IE job there but I kept thinking a lot since I am a IE undergraduate before.</p>
<p>As defined by the industrial, averagely, there is a new model added to the database per 3 or 4 days, each new model may have similar name of parts but the size and even shape may look different, which make the processing more complicate or impossible to make plan every time.</p>
<p>Because once you make a processing plan, one day or half a day passed, and workers won&#8217;t even take a look at it, they just look at the assembly drawings and gather the parts together, assemble them.</p>
<p>Since lots of the products are customized, the producing time varies a lot, sometimes workers spend short time to assemble it because it was precisely machined, sometimes it cost a huge time for them to assemble together due to inaccurate tolerances.</p>
<p>What worse is, the painting job is outsourced, actually it is called &#8216;Electrophoresis&#8217; (probably!), which makes it harder to get a preciser processing time.</p>
<p>What even worse is, we cannot do processing plan, we just design them, and send drawings and CNC codes to the manufacturing Dept. to produce them directly, without instructions from technology Dept.</p>
<p>There is no time to do such job~ you will fall behind your competitors.</p>
<p>I kept thinking the poor quality generated by this way, accompanied with poor standard and processing plan.</p>
<p>Each product likes a building, it has common feature like foundations, structures, walls, floors, interiors and exteriors, but each feature won&#8217;t be the same for two buildings, what problem is, we have hundreds of such types and still increasing with high speed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I kept thinking, when can we simulate such a small but messy plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Industrial Engineers are Happy by Mae Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2009/01/18/industrial-engineers-are-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-58568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mae Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2009/01/18/industrial-engineers-are-happy/#comment-58568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a Manufacturing Engineer but my work is in Industrial Engineering.  It&#039;s a satisfying profession especially when you focus you work in Manual Operations.  IE is a very helpful department in a company and mostly positioned in the middle of the management and labor.  As long as this 2 party doesn&#039;t take advantage of each other, IE will definitely survive.  IE uses scientific method to come up with the best available method to help company increase their productivity.  We represent the people in the management and ensures that the labor and system are efficiently.  We also make sure that their work environment is safe and try to address their concerns.  In return, company should compensate their people and with the use of IE in making a formulate incentive programs both parties are happy and IEs are happy too.  It&#039;s a requisite that both parties should gain to be fair. 

Of course not all aspect of IE is fulfilling but I think we have more versatility or works in different projects, different circumstances, which is a good factor in enjoying the career we took.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Manufacturing Engineer but my work is in Industrial Engineering.  It&#8217;s a satisfying profession especially when you focus you work in Manual Operations.  IE is a very helpful department in a company and mostly positioned in the middle of the management and labor.  As long as this 2 party doesn&#8217;t take advantage of each other, IE will definitely survive.  IE uses scientific method to come up with the best available method to help company increase their productivity.  We represent the people in the management and ensures that the labor and system are efficiently.  We also make sure that their work environment is safe and try to address their concerns.  In return, company should compensate their people and with the use of IE in making a formulate incentive programs both parties are happy and IEs are happy too.  It&#8217;s a requisite that both parties should gain to be fair. </p>
<p>Of course not all aspect of IE is fulfilling but I think we have more versatility or works in different projects, different circumstances, which is a good factor in enjoying the career we took.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Predicting Process Variability by Human Judgment Beats Simulation &#124; Success in Simulation</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/11/03/predicting-process-variability/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Judgment Beats Simulation &#124; Success in Simulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/2008/11/03/predicting-process-variability/#comment-229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you haven’t read it, I’d suggest you pause now and read the blog on Predicting Process Variability. Did you pass the test? Don’t feel bad, almost no one does. My facility is much more complicated [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you haven’t read it, I’d suggest you pause now and read the blog on Predicting Process Variability. Did you pass the test? Don’t feel bad, almost no one does. My facility is much more complicated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simulation Stakeholder Bill of Rights by Simulationist Bill of Rights &#124; Success in Simulation</title>
		<link>http://www.simio.com/blog/2010/01/20/simulation-stakeholder-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Simulationist Bill of Rights &#124; Success in Simulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simio.com/blog/?p=83#comment-228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Simulation Stakeholder Bill of Rights I proposed some reasonable expectations that a consumer of a simulation project might have. But [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Simulation Stakeholder Bill of Rights I proposed some reasonable expectations that a consumer of a simulation project might have. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
